Posts Tagged ‘bikescore’

Detroit’s WalkScore is broken. Bikescore too?

Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

The popular Walkscore web site gives estimates of a city’s walkability.

It’s not perfect. It’s really a measure of density rather than infrastructure. It also assumes roads have sidewalks (because Google Maps makes the same assumption.)

But there’s a bigger problem in the city of Detroit.

Detroit neighborhoods like Midtown receive high scores of 85 out of 100 — or “very walkable.”

Neighborhoods like Downtown receive an 18 or “car dependent.” For reference Auburn Hills gets a 36.

Looking at the walkability heatmap shows the Walkscore bug. Notice the red stair steps along the river? The Walkscore program is selecting restaurants, stores and other destinations in Canada. That might be okay for but it doesn’t work for walking.

Unfortunately affects all the Detroit neighborhoods along the River and lowers the overall score for the City.

So breath with relief. Detroit is not tied with Garden City with a score of 50.

We’ve documented this bug as have others and shared it with WalkScore, but it hasn’t been resolved yet.

Bike Score

This week the walkscore people released a bike score. As far as we can tell, they didn’t publish Detroit’s number but our guess is it’s even more inaccurate than the city’s walkscore.

Besides this border bug, their methodology relies heavily on the American Census Bureau bike commuting numbers for Detroit, which we’ve already shown are too inaccurate to be useful.

They also assume that streets with bike infrastructure are more bikeable than streets without. That may make sense in most cities, but not in Detroit.

Which of these two streets are more bike friendly to your eyes?

Despite the motorized traffic, groups like Bikescore, the League of American Bicyclists, and the Alliance for Walking and Biking say the one of the left is because there’s a bike marking on the pavement. However, what cyclist wouldn’t choose the wide open Second Avenue instead (or the similar Third, Brush, John R, 12th, 14th, etc.)

Unfortunately the very low traffic volumes on Detroit roads aren’t measured in the scoring.

There could be a traffic factor based on vehicle ownership and road density. It would probably be a more accurate indicator than the census bikes counts, though that’s setting the bar pretty low.

Until such a factor is developed and applied in the scoring, Detroit will not be accurately recognized as the bike friendly city it truly is.