On Wednesday, Oakland County hosted an Urban Trails Meeting for the communities within the four geographic township boundaries of Royal Oak, Southfield, Troy, and Bloomfield. The meeting’s purpose was “to discuss the possibilities and opportunities for enhancing and promoting non-motorized connectivity in an urban environment.”
The southeast quadrant of Oakland County is arguably the most developed area within the county. However, it is heavily used by bikers and pedestrians for travel and recreation, demonstrating the desire for non-motorized facilities that are safe and connected. The infrastructure is already in place for a multi- use, interconnected urban trail system in your community – lets build on what exists and help market this area as a great place to walk and bike!
The turnout was very good. Most of the invited communities were in attendance and gave brief summaries of where they are at this their biking facilities.
Next, Oakland County described their potential services, including GIS and planning. They also mentioned possibilie of service grants so communities could apply for this help from the County. With Michigan’s strong home-rule design, the County really can’t force bike networks and municipal cooperation. At best they can encourage and show the way. But at the end of the day, it’s local government’s job to get this done.
And as most area cyclists will tell you, they are not getting the job done with a few exceptions (namely Ferndale, Madison Heights, and Troy.) This is despite the fact that there is very strong support for biking facilities among the public. And, in some cases, these bike networks are even specified in community master plans.
Money is often a given excuse, yet 1% of the state road funding these communities receive must be spent on non-motorized transportation. In addition, M-DOT awards transportation enhancement and CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality) grants for non-motorized facilities. This is not an excuse.
What appears to be true is there is internal opposition within local governments, primarily from older, auto-centric, stuck in the mud individuals.
Some have suggested we wait until these roadblocks retire. I disagree. Cyclists shouldn’t be expected to forgo safe facilities until then. We’ve been patient so far while the rest of the country (and world) move forward.